Bidrag til Norsk Rødlistevurdering for Bruskfisk i 2027
Rapporten gir et sammendrag av Havforskningsinstituttets datagrunnlag for fangstfordeling og -mengder av bruskfisk i norske farvann basert på fangster fra toktserier i tillegg til tall fra Referanseflåten. Data er presentert som kombinerte fangsttall og biomasse av arter fra alle aktuelle toktserier, samt beregnet fangst per enhet innsats (CPUE) for årene 2010-2025. Rapporten ble laget som svar på en forespørsel fra den norske Ekspertkomiteen for Fisk, som støttemiddel for deres rødlistevurdering av bruskfisk i 2027.
Summary
This report provides a summary of The Institute of Marine Research’s (IMR) data sources on catch distributions and relative abundance trends of elasmobranch species in Norwegian waters based on catches from survey time series as well as from the Reference Fleet. Data are presented as combined catches and biomass for each species from relevant surveys, in addition to estimated catch per unit effort (CPUE) for the years 2010-2025. This report was written in response to a request from the Norwegian Expert Committee for Fish and is intended to provide supporting information for their red-list assessment of elasmobranch fishes in 2027.
1 - Overview
This report provides a brief overview of elasmobranch catch distributions and relative abundance trends from the Institute of Marine Research’s (IMR) data sources. The report is intended to provide supporting information for the Norwegian Expert Committee for Fish’s 2027 assessment of elasmobranch fishes.
Data are provided from IMR’s demersal trawl surveys for species that are sufficiently represented in the surveys. For species with sporadic registrations that are rarely or never caught on surveys, summaries of data collected by the Reference Fleet (consisting of commercial fishing vessels) are shown. Incorrect species identifications may occur in the dataset, particularly in earlier years.
While not presented in this report, IMR has also undertaken research on elasmobranchs that may be considered informative for the Red-List assessment (see References and Further Resources). This includes a dedicated longline survey targeting spurdog (Squalus acanthias) from 2021-2025 (Andrade et al. 2024; Delaval et al. in review). Preliminary analyses suggest spurdog catch rates that are consistent across the five years. Because the survey mainly targets larger individuals, the increased recruitment of juveniles that is apparent in bottom trawl surveys (see Reketokt and ICES spurdog assessments) cannot be seen in the longline survey data.
Figure 1: IMR demersal trawl stations from selected surveys between 2010-2025.
2 - Data and methods
The survey series that were considered most informative for assessing the catch distributions and relative abundance of sharks, skates, and rabbit fish are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. Only stations north of 57°N and east of 0°E were included, encompassing the North Sea, Norwegian Sea, and the Barents Sea and spanning the period 2010-2025. Only data collected using Campelen and Alfredo bottom trawl gears were used in this report. We present the raw data from the surveys in the form of catch numbers and biomass, as well as a summary of catch per unit effort (CPUE in kg km-2) for each survey.
Ten elasmobranch species had sufficient catches in IMR demersal trawls over the 2010-2025 period to produce a reasonable overview of catch distributions and relative abundance trends. For each species, the following is provided:
Combined catches across the years 2010-2025 for each of the IMR surveys where the species was observed.
CPUE in terms of biomass for each of the selected surveys.
Total catch count across IMR demersal trawls from 2010-2025.
Total catch biomass across IMR demersal trawls from 2010-2025.
Raw data of elasmobranch catches from the Reference Fleet are also presented as a supplementary source of information, which may aid in filling data gaps for species that are seldom encountered on IMR demersal trawl surveys.
Survey
Area and description
Season
Fishing gear
Økotokt
Barents Sea Norwegian-Russian ecosystem cruise
Autumn
Campelen bottom trawl
Egga Nord
Norwegian Sea continental slope NOR deep-sea fish cruise, northern part (every other year)
Autumn
Alfredo bottom trawl
Egga Sør
Norwegian Sea continental slope NOR deep-sea fish cruise, southern part (every other year)
Spring
Alfredo bottom trawl
Kysttokt
Varanger Stad NOR coastal cruise
Autumn
Campelen bottom trawl
Reketokt
North Sea NOR shrimp NDSK cruise
Winter
Campelen bottom trawl
Table 1: Overview of survey time series included in the report.
3 - Survey trends per species
3.1 - Rabbit fish (Chimaera monstrosa)
Norwegian: havmus
Figure 3.1.1: Catches of rabbit fish (Chimaera monstrosa) in IMR demersal trawls between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.1.2: Rabbit fish (Chimaera monstrosa) CPUE (kg km-2) on selected surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.1.3: Rabbit fish (Chimaera monstrosa) total catch count and biomass on demersal trawl surveys between2010-2025.
3.2 - Spurdog (Squalus acanthias)
Norwegian: pigghå
Figure 3.2.1: Catches of spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in IMR demersal trawls between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.2.2: Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) CPUE (kg km-2) on selected surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.2.3: Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) total catch count and biomass on demersal trawl surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.5.1: Catches of small-spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula) in IMR demersal trawls between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.5.2: Small-spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula) CPUE (kg km-2) on selected surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.5.3: Small-spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula) total catch count and biomass on demersal trawl surveys between 2010-2025.
3.6 - Thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata)
Norwegian: kloskate
Figure 3.6.1: Catches of thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) in IMR demersal trawls between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.6.2: Thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) CPUE (kg km-2) on selected surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.6.3: Thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) total catch count and biomass on demersal trawl surveys between 2010-2025.
3.7 - Arctic skate (Amblyraja hyperborea)
Norwegian: isskate
Figure 3.7.1: Catches of arctic skate (Amblyraja hyperborea) in IMR demersal trawls between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.7.2: Arctic skate (Amblyraja hyperborea) CPUE (kg km-2) on selected surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.7.3: Arctic skate (Amblyraja hyperborea) total catch count and biomass on demersal trawl surveys between 2010-2025.
3.8 - Round ray (Rajella fyllae)
Norwegian: rundskate
Figure 3.8.1: Catches of round ray (Rajella fyllae) in IMR demersal trawls between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.8.2: Round ray (Rajella fyllae) CPUE (kg km-2) on selected surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.8.3: Round ray (Rajella fyllae) total catch count and biomass on demersal trawl surveys between 2010-2025.
3.9 - Sailray (Rajella lintea)
Norwegian: hvitskate
Figure 3.9.1: Catches of sailray (Rajella lintea) in IMR demersal trawls between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.9.2: Sailray (Rajella lintea) CPUE (kg km-2) on selected surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.9.3: Sailray (Rajella lintea) total catch count and biomass on demersal trawl surveys between 2010-2025.
3.10 - Spinytail skate (Bathyraja spinicauda)
Norwegian: gråskate
Figure 3.10.1: Catches of spinytail skate (Bathyraja spinicauda) in IMR demersal trawls between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.10.2: Spinytail skate (Bathyraja spinicauda) CPUE (kg km-2) on selected surveys between 2010-2025.
Figure 3.10.3: Spinytail skate (Bathyraja spinicauda) total catch count and biomass on demersal trawl surveys between 2010-2025.
3.11 - Occurrence of skates on surveys
An overview of skate species occurrence presented as the number of trawls where a species was reported in IMR demersal trawls is shown in Table 2. The list includes rare species for which abundance data was insufficient for the above analyses, as well as unidentified skates.
Skates and rays, unspecified (Skater, uspesifisert)
17
58
63
56
33
74
125
203
286
262
199
130
121
125
185
150
Table 2: The number of trawls with the presence of skates in IMR's survey database per year (2010-2025) .
4 - Reference Fleet trends
We provide a summary of catches of elasmobranchs from the Reference Fleet, which may assist in providing an overview of species that are not well represented in standard IMR surveys (Table 3, Figure 4.1). Data are shown for 2016-2025. Before 2016, the identification of elasmobranchs to species aboard Reference Fleet vessels was less established. Species identification errors may still occur.
The table below shows the number of fishing hauls in which the presence of a species was recorded per year for the entire fleet. The map shows registered catches across the entire period. Note that data are inclusive of all fishing gears, and geographic scope and commissioned vessels vary between years. Data only include waters north of 57°N and east of 0°E.
Skates and rays, unspecified (Skater, uspesifisert)
134
129
103
246
116
113
163
93
162
182
Rabbit fish (Chimaera monstrosa, havmus)
1039
892
909
1227
969
984
614
688
752
701
Table 3: The number of trawls with the presence of elasmobranch species recorded in the Reference Fleet data per year (2016-2025).
Figure 4.1: Location of elasmobranch catches as reported by the Reference Fleet between 2016-2025
5 - References and further resources
Albert, O. T., Junge, C., & Myrlund, M. K. (2019). Young mums are rebuilding the spurdog stock (Squalus acanthias L.) in Norwegian waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 76(7), 2193-2204. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz156
Andrade, H., Nilsen, T., Vollen, T., Harbitz, A., Junge, C., & Albert, O. T. (2024). A longline survey for spurdog distribution and life history along the Norwegian coast. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 31(2), Article e12676. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12676
Bortoluzzi, J. R., McNicholas, G. E., Jackson, A. L., Klöcker, C. A., Ferter, K. et al. (2024). Transboundary movements of porbeagle sharks support need for continued cooperative research and management approaches. Fisheries Research, 275, 107007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107007
Dahlmo, L. S., Ferter, K., Junge, C., Bjelland, O., Thorburn, J. et al. (2026). Spatial and temporal interaction patterns of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 83(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaf218
Delaval, A., Andrade, H., Nilsen, T., Vollen, T., Lavezza, R. et al. (in review). Distribution and life-history of spurdog (Squalus acanthias) along the Norwegian coast inferred from a five-year fishery-independent longline survey. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8583209/v1
Delaval, A., Clegg, T., Lynghammar, A., Bruvold, I. M., Tranang, C. A., & Williams, T. (2025). The distribution of skates (Order Rajiformes) along the Norwegian continental shelf and slope. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 82(9). https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaf172
Garbett, A., Loca, S. L., Barreau, T., Biscoito, M., Bradley, C. et al. (2023). A holistic and comprehensive data approach validates the distribution of the critically endangered flapper skate (Dipturus intermedius). Journal of Fish Biology, 103(3), 516-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15466
Jac, R., Albretsen, J., Höffle, H., Lennox, R. J., Staby, A. et al. (2026). Moving north: Warmer waters expand populations of deep-water cartilaginous fishes into Arctic waters. PLOS ONE, 21(3), e0343778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343778
Jac, R., Höffle, H., Albretsen, J., Jakobsdóttir, K., Staby, A. et al. (2022). Of three sharks and one chimaera: varied habitat preferences across a latitudinal range revealed by coastal and offshore surveys. Journal of Fish Biology, 100(3), 660-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14979
Junge, C., Ferter, K., Klöcker, C. A., Bjelland, O., Albretsen, J. et al. (2024). Tag attachment innovation on spurdog (Squalus acanthias) reveals year-round coastal association of pregnant females in northeastern Atlantic waters. Journal of Fish Biology, 106(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.16000
Klöcker, C. A., Albert, O. T., Ferter, K., Bjelland, O., Lennox, R. J. et al. (2024). Seasonal habitat use and diel vertical migration in female spurdog in Nordic waters. Movement Ecology, 12(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-024-00498-2
Klöcker, C. A., Bjelland, O., Ferter, K., Arostegui, M. C., Braun, C. D. et al. (2025). Basking sharks of the Arctic Circle: year-long, high-resolution tracking data reveal wide thermal range and prey-driven vertical movements across habitats. Animal Biotelemetry, 13(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-025-00407-3
Klöcker, C. A., Schlindwein, A., Arostegui, M. C., Bruvold, I. M., Wernström, J. V. et al. (2025). Giants in the cold: Morphological evidence for vascular heat retention in the viscera but not the skeletal muscle of the basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus). Journal of Fish Biology,. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.70052
McMillan, M. N., Izzo, C., Junge, C., Albert, O. T., Jung, A., & Gillanders, B. M. (2017). Analysis of vertebral chemistry to assess stock structure in a deep-sea shark, Etmopterus spinax. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 74(3), 793-803. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw176
Nielsen, J., Christiansen, J. S., Præbel, K., Møller, P. R., Devine, B. et al. (2025). Spatial distribution of Greenland shark Somniosus microcephalus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) life stages across the northern North Atlantic. Ecology and Evolution, 15(7), e71564. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71564
Williams, T., Helle, K., & Aschan, M. (2008). The distribution of chondrichthyans along the northern coast of Norway. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65(7), 1161-1174. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn103